Accident Helpers Blog

Can I sue if I was partially at fault

Written by Nicole Gant | Jan 20, 2025 9:58:18 AM

Being involved in a car accident is always a stressful experience, but the situation can become even more complex if you believe you were partially at fault. Many people assume that being partially responsible eliminates their ability to sue for damages, but this is not always the case.

The answer largely depends on your state’s laws and the circumstances of the accident. This article will explore whether you can sue if you are partially at fault, how comparative fault laws work, and what happens if you are entirely at fault.

Can You Sue if You're at Fault?

The ability to sue after a car accident hinges on the degree of fault assigned to each party. In states that follow comparative fault systems, being partially at fault does not automatically bar you from recovering compensation. Here’s how it works:

Comparative Fault Systems

Most states follow some form of comparative fault, which allows you to recover damages as long as your share of the fault is below a certain threshold (often 50% or 51%). However, your recovery amount will be reduced by your percentage of fault

Contributory Negligence States

A handful of states (Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia) follow the contributory negligence rule, which bars you from recovering any compensation if you are even 1% at fault. If you live in one of these states, suing while being partially at fault is not an option.

In City Cabs, Inc. v. Griffith, 194 Va. 818, 75 S.E.2d 487 (Va. 1953), the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed a lower court’s ruling that denied the plaintiff of damages for its driver’s contributory negligence. In the instant case, the plaintiff’s driver failed to see the defendant’s car before entering an intersection, until it was within sixty feet of him in the intersection – the court held that the plaintiff’s driver failed to keep a proper lookout.

However, what would qualify as contributory negligence will differ in different situations. In Seaman v. McQueen, 51 N.C. App. 500, 277 S.E.2d 118 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981), the plaintiff entered an intersection on a green light and the defendant entered on a red light, following a school bus in such a manner that the defendant could not have safely stopped after noticing the red light. 

The Court of Appeals was of the opinion that the plaintiff kept a proper lookout because he was sufficiently aware of what was going on to his left after seeing the school bus turn, and even if had looked to his left, his view of the defendant’s car would have been obscured by the bus.

Summarily, understanding your state’s fault system is critical in determining your ability to pursue legal action.

Comparative Fault and How It Works

Comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence, is a legal principle used to allocate damages among parties based on their degree of responsibility for an accident. Here’s a closer look:

Pure Comparative Fault

In states that follow pure comparative fault rules, you can recover damages regardless of your share of fault, even if you were 99% responsible. However, your compensation will be significantly reduced. For instance, if your damages total $20,000 and you are 70% at fault, you can recover $6,000.

Some of the states that currently follow this are California according to Cal. Civ. Code § 1714 and LI v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 119 Cal. Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226 (Cal. 1975). Florida also follows the pure comparative fault according to Fla. Stat. § 768.81 which provide that in a negligence action, contributory fault will proportionately diminish the amount rewarded, but will not bar recovery.

Modified Comparative Fault

Most states use modified comparative fault systems, where you can only recover damages if your fault is below a specific threshold, such as 50% or 51%. If your fault equals or exceeds this limit, you cannot recover compensation.

Some of the states where this rule operates are Georgia (Ga. Code Ann. § 5-12-33) and Idaho (Idaho Code Ann. § 6-801) where plaintiffs may not recover is they are 50% or more at fault. But in Indiana (Ind. Code § 34-51-2-6) and Texas (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001) plaintiffs may not recover if they are up to 51% or more at fault.

Examples of Comparative Fault in Action

  • Scenario 1: You are rear-ended at a stoplight but you stopped abruptly at a yellow when you could have crossed the intersection safely. The court finds you 30% at fault for improper stopping. Your damages are $15,000, so you recover $10,500.
  • Scenario 2: You run a red light and collide with another vehicle that was speeding. You are found 60% at fault, and the other driver is 40% at fault. In a state with a 50% fault threshold, you cannot recover any damages.

Comparative fault systems aim to distribute liability fairly, but they can make lawsuits more complex.

What If You're 100% at Fault?

If you are entirely at fault for an accident, your legal options are significantly limited and you will not be able to recover from the other party. However, there are some other possibilities and scenarios to consider:

Legal Defenses to Explore

Even if you think you are fully responsible, the other party may share some degree of fault. A skilled attorney can investigate the facts and potentially uncover evidence of shared liability, such as:

  • The other driver was speeding or distracted.
  • Poor road conditions contributed to the accident.
  • Vehicle defects played a role in the crash.

Insurance Coverage and Settlements

If you are 100% at fault, your insurance will typically cover the other party’s damages up to your policy limits. However, if their damages exceed your coverage, you may be personally liable for the remaining amount.

Avoiding Legal Action Against You

If the other party sues you, hiring an attorney is crucial to mitigate your financial exposure and negotiate a fair settlement.

The Role of Evidence in Establishing Fault

Regardless of your level of fault, gathering evidence is essential to protect your interests and potentially strengthen your case. Key forms of evidence include:

  • Accident Reports: Police reports often provide an unbiased account of the accident and may assign preliminary fault after initial investigations. Insurance adjusters significantly rely on police reports before recommending settlement options to an insurer.
  • Photographs and Videos: Visual evidence of the scene, vehicle damage, and road conditions can be pivotal in determining liability. This is why it is advisable that you immediately document any accident you’ve been in by taking pictures and videos of the scene.
  • Witness Statements: Testimonies from eyewitnesses can support your version of events. The testimony of a neutral party will carry more weight.
  • Expert Opinions: Accident reconstruction specialists can analyze the crash dynamics and help allocate fault.

Strong evidence can shift the fault percentage and increase your chances of recovering compensation.

How Comparative Fault Affects Settlements

In cases involving partial fault, insurance settlement negotiations often reflect the comparative fault principles of the state. Insurance companies will assess the evidence and attempt to assign a fault percentage to reduce their payout. Here’s what you need to know:

  • Negotiating Fault Percentages: Insurance adjusters may try to inflate your fault percentage to lower the settlement offer. An experienced attorney can challenge these assessments and advocate for a fair outcome.
  • Partial Fault Settlements: If you share some blame, the settlement amount will be adjusted accordingly. Always ensure the fault percentages are accurate before accepting an offer.
  • Structured Settlements: In some cases, partial fault settlements may be paid out over time, especially if the damages are substantial.

Being well-informed and represented can help you navigate these challenges.

Why Legal Representation Matters

Hiring an attorney is one of the most important steps you can take if you are partially at fault in an accident. Here’s how a lawyer can help:

  • Case Evaluation: An attorney can review the facts and determine whether you have a viable claim.
  • Negotiating with Insurers: Lawyers are skilled negotiators who can handle complex fault disputes with insurance companies.
  • Court Representation: If your case goes to court, having a lawyer ensures your rights are protected and your arguments are presented effectively.

Without legal representation, you may be at a disadvantage when dealing with insurance companies or opposing counsel.

How Can The Accident Helpers Help You?

Being partially at fault for an accident doesn’t necessarily prevent you from suing for damages, but your ability to recover compensation depends on your state’s laws and the specific circumstances of the case. Understanding comparative fault systems, gathering strong evidence, and seeking legal advice are all crucial steps to protect your interests.

If you find yourself in this situation, the assistance of an experienced attorney is crucial. But, like many other people, you may not know how to select an experienced attorney in your area. That’s where we come in.

Through The Accident Helpers, you can easily access experienced legal help for your personal injury case because we maintain a network of the most trusted accident attorneys across the country. All you have to do us contact us, we will get the details of your case, and immediately connect you to the best accident lawyer in your city.

Our services come at no cost to you, so contact us today!